Jake Bates or Will Reichard: Who Should You Start?

2026 Week 1 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.

Bates' Blowout Script Edges Reichard's Better Leg

Detroit's 27.8 implied total against a soft Saints defense is the whole story here — that kind of scoring pace means more extra points and more red-zone trips for Bates than Minnesota's 21.5 total gives Reichard, even in a game where Minnesota is favored by only 1.5. Reichard is the more accurate kicker by a wide margin and has already banked a franchise-record 62-yard make, but a low-scoring, closer game caps his ceiling on volume alone. The gap in raw stalls is minor, but the gap in game environment is not, and that is what separates two very similar dome kickers on similar depth charts. This is a lean, not a mismatch — either one is a fine start.

What flips it: A Lions spread that tightens toward a one-score game would erase Bates' scoring-pace edge and flip this to Reichard.

AI editor

Jake Bates

Jake Bates

K9DETvs NO

Projected Points

Start· medium
Will Reichard

Will Reichard

K12MINvs GB

Projected Points

Toss-Up

Why Jake Bates

Start· medium

Starting placekicker. Strong-legged kicker with deep range on field-goal attempts.

K9 in a dome with a 27.8 implied total — 2.9 projected XPs plus 1.7 makes and 50-plus range give Bates a top-10 floor.

  • Playing in the higher-scoring game script by a wide margin, which means more extra-point and short-range chances
  • Consensus rank edge (K9 vs K12) reflects that Detroit's blowout-favorite role keeps feeding him volume

The call

  • The 27.8 implied team total as a 7-point favorite is the key number: that volume of scoring means 2.9 projected extra points on top of 1.7 made field goals, which is exactly how kickers hit 8-plus.
  • Dome game, no weather risk — one of the few variables that actually separates kickers is neutralized here.
  • Locked-in PK1 with no injury designation, 79% accuracy (27/34) and a 59-yard long with 50-plus makes in 4 games, so the long-range upside is live.
  • Only mild caution: 1.9 projected attempts and 1.4 red-zone stalls per game mean he needs the offense to keep stalling short of the goal line for field-goal volume, so the score leans XP-dependent.

Why Will Reichard

Toss-Up

Starting placekicker and 2025 First-Team All-Pro. Strong-legged third-year kicker with franchise-record 62-yard make.

Toss-up — K12 by consensus, projects K14 this week: kicks indoors, and 1.3 red-zone stalls a game.

  • Far more accurate kicker this season and has hit from 50-plus nearly every other game — the safer make if he gets the look
  • Tied game script with Green Bay means fewer garbage-time field goals but also fewer forced settle-for-three situations

Head-to-head stats

MetricJake BatesWill Reichard
Projected points
Consensus rankK9K12
Projected FG attempts1.92.1
Red-zone stalls / game1.4(2025)1.3(2025)
Kicking conditionsIndoors, no weather riskIndoors, no weather risk
Implied total · spread27.8-7.021.5+1.5
Field-goal %79.4%(2025)94.3%(2025)
Depth chartK1K1
Start/Sit record00+1 toss-up

Signal breakdown

  • 8.7 vs 8.4 projected PPR pointsJake Bates +
  • Rank 9 vs 12Jake Bates +
  • 1.9 vs 2.1 projected attemptsWill Reichard +
  • 1.4 vs 1.3 red-zone stalls per gameJake Bates +
  • dome vs domeeven
  • Implied 27.8 vs 21.5 team pointsJake Bates +
  • No injury designationseven

Compare different players

Week 1228 players
Player A
vs
Player B

Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.

This week’s toughest calls

Want full matchup analysis & AI picks? →

Save your roster and get a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up call on every player, every week — plus prop pages, matchup data, and AI-powered NFL analysis.

Add to My Team — free

Or browse NFL player props or this week’s Start/Sit board.