Mark Andrews or Michael Wilson: Who Should You Start?

Preliminary board

2026 Week 2 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.

Verdicts sharpen as practice reports land.

Start Andrews: Baltimore's scoring environment outweighs Wilson's snap advantage

Start Mark Andrews: the nearly identical raw projections hide a meaningful edge in positional value, consensus standing and Baltimore's scoring environment. Wilson's heavy usage gives him a legitimate volume path, and he led Arizona wideouts in Week 1 snaps while catching five of seven targets (Yahoo Sports/Cards Wire 2026-09-14). Andrews' risk is his lower snap rate, but his TE1 role, red-zone mismatch profile and quarterback rapport fit a Ravens offense expected to score often.

What flips it: A meaningful reduction in Andrews' red-zone role or Baltimore's scoring expectation.

Sources: Yahoo Sports/Cards Wire · Sep 14, 2026

AI editor

Mark Andrews

Mark Andrews

TE15BALvs NO

Projected Points

Start· medium
Michael Wilson

Michael Wilson

WR37ARIvs SEA

Projected Points

Toss-Up

Mark Andrews’s market

Michael Wilson’s market

Why Mark Andrews

Start· medium

TE1 and red-zone mismatch. Veteran seam-stretcher with strong hands and quarterback rapport.

25% target share and 72% snaps in a 27-point implied offense — Andrews is a top-12 TE role even with a TE15 projection.

  • Andrews' red-zone mismatch role makes Baltimore's favorable scoring outlook more valuable than it would be for a pure pocket target.
  • The call is firm but not effortless: his lower snap rate leaves him more dependent on efficient high-value touches.

The call

  • A 25% target share is elite for the position; Andrews is the clear passing-game focal point at TE with a 72% snap share and no injury designation.
  • Baltimore's 27.0 implied total and -7.5 spread point to a high-scoring, red-zone-heavy script, which is exactly where Andrews cashes in on touchdowns.
  • The DvP composite of 12 of 32 reads mildly unfavorable, but it's a 1-game sample with 0.00 confidence — not enough to override the usage.
  • Risk is the 10.1 projection and TE15 label: if Baltimore builds a lead and leans run, the volume ceiling narrows to a 6-8 point day.

Why Michael Wilson

Toss-Up

WR2 and big-bodied outside target. Physical at the catch point with 1,000-yard breakout production and full-season availability.

Toss-up — WR37 consensus, projects WR44 this week: SEA is the 10th-toughest matchup vs WRs, 17.3 implied team total caps the ceiling.

  • Wilson's outside-target role and strong catch-point profile give him a real path if Arizona throws more than expected.
  • His volume can win this pairing, but the low-scoring team context leaves less room for inefficient targets or stalled drives.

Latest on Wilson

Role

Wilson played a team-high 64 of 85 snaps (75%) among wideouts in Week 1, catching five of seven targets for 56 yards.

Yahoo Sports/Cards Wire · Sep 14, 2026

Josh Weinfuss breaks down Michael Wilson's new three-year, $75 million extension with the Cardinals.

VideoESPN · Sep 4, 2026

The Cardinals have signed wide receiver Michael Wilson to a three-year extension, with sources telling ESPN and NFL Network that the wide receiver's new deal is worth $75 million.

ESPN · Sep 3, 2026

Wide receiver coming off breakout season in Arizona

azcardinals.com · Sep 3, 2026

Reported by the sources listed — not independently verified.

Head-to-head stats

MetricMark AndrewsMichael Wilson
Projected points
Consensus rankTE15WR37
Opponent vs positionNO · 12 of 321-game sampleSEA · 10 of 321-game sample
Receptions18 of 3220 of 32
Receiving Yards17 of 327 of 32
Receiving TDs1 of 321 of 32
Targets24 of 3222 of 32
Anytime TD1 of 321 of 32
Target share25%19%
Reception share24%19%
Implied total · spread27.0-7.517.3+10.0
Depth chartTE1WR2
Snap share72%85%
Start/Sit record01

Recent form

Mark Andrews — last 1 week

Week 1vs IND

Michael Wilson — last 1 week

Week 1vs LAC

Signal breakdown

  • 10.1 vs 10.0 projected PPR pointsMark Andrews +
  • Rank 15 vs 37Mark Andrews +
  • Opponent DvP rank 12 vs 10 (32 = softest)even
  • Implied 27.0 vs 17.3 team pointsMark Andrews +
  • No injury designationseven
  • 72% vs 85% snap shareMichael Wilson +

Compare different players

Week 2226 players
Player A
vs
Player B

Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.

This week’s toughest calls

Get a Start/Sit call on your whole roster →

Save your team once and see a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up verdict on every player, every week — with the matchup, usage and game-script evidence behind each call.

Add to My Team — free

Or browse this week’s NFL games or NFL player props.