Greg Dulcich or Pat Freiermuth: Who Should You Start?

2026 Week 1 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.

Freiermuth’s steadier role wins a narrow tight-end call

Freiermuth gets the nod because his more stable presence gives a fragile tight-end projection a better floor, while Pittsburgh’s stronger scoring environment adds touchdown equity. Dulcich can beat him with a seam play, and his matchup is marginally less difficult, but his lighter role makes that outcome more dependent on efficiency. The risk with Freiermuth is that his modest target involvement and a tough Atlanta matchup leave little margin if Pittsburgh fails to finish drives.

What flips it: A late role change that puts Dulcich on the field for more passing downs.

AI editor

Greg Dulcich

Greg Dulcich

TE24MIAvs LV

Projected Points

Toss-Up
Pat Freiermuth

Pat Freiermuth

TE18PITvs ATL

Projected Points

Toss-Up

Why Greg Dulcich

Toss-Up

TE1 in receiving role. Seam-stretching athlete with injury-marked career arc and limited blocking value.

Toss-up — TE24 by consensus and projection: LV is the 5th-toughest matchup vs TEs, 14% target share in 2025.

  • Dulcich’s seam-stretching profile gives him a path to win on fewer snaps.
  • His lighter role is offset somewhat by a matchup that is slightly less difficult.

Why Pat Freiermuth

Toss-Up

TE1 in pass-catching role. Reliable chain-mover with red-zone size and dependable hands.

Toss-up — TE18 consensus, projects TE17 this week: ATL is the 3rd-toughest matchup vs TEs, 12% target share in 2025.

  • Freiermuth’s red-zone size gives his modest target share a better touchdown route.
  • His chain-moving style supports steadier production than Dulcich’s more specialized usage.

Head-to-head stats

MetricGreg DulcichPat Freiermuth
Projected points
Consensus rankTE24TE18
Opponent vs positionLV · 5 of 320-game sampleATL · 3 of 320-game sample
Receptions3 of 323 of 32
Receiving Yards3 of 328 of 32
Receiving TDs9 of 321 of 32
Targets3 of 324 of 32
Anytime TD9 of 321 of 32
Target share14%(2025)12%(2025)
Reception share15%(2025)13%(2025)
Implied total · spread19.3+3.022.8-3.0
Depth chartTE1TE1
Snap share44%(2025)53%(2025)

Signal breakdown

  • 7.1 vs 8.4 projected PPR pointsPat Freiermuth +
  • Rank 24 vs 18Pat Freiermuth +
  • Opponent DvP rank 5 vs 3 (32 = softest)even
  • Implied 19.3 vs 22.8 team pointsPat Freiermuth +
  • No injury designationseven
  • 44% vs 53% snap sharePat Freiermuth +

Compare different players

Week 1244 players
Player A
vs
Player B

Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.

This week’s toughest calls

Want full matchup analysis & AI picks? →

Save your roster and get a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up call on every player, every week — plus prop pages, matchup data, and AI-powered NFL analysis.

Add to My Team — free

Or browse this week’s NFL games or NFL player props.