Dalton Schultz or Deebo Samuel Sr.: Who Should You Start?
Preliminary board2026 Week 4 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.
Verdicts sharpen as practice reports land.
Start Schultz for the stronger role-based floor, though Deebo keeps it close
Schultz's TE1 role and 22% target share give him the more dependable route to production, making the narrow edge meaningful despite his lower raw projection. Deebo's softer Denver matchup, higher projection and manufactured-touch role keep the choice close, but his 14% target share leaves him more dependent on designed plays than a full receiving workload. Schultz's recent 26-point spike shows his ceiling, while the 6.0 and 7.5 around it expose the real risk: his volume can still yield a quiet fantasy day.
What flips it: A meaningful increase in Deebo's receiving role, closing the gap with Schultz's current target share.
AI editor

Dalton Schultz
4.97.09.0 Projected Points

Deebo Samuel Sr.
7.39.010.7 Projected Points
Dalton Schultz’s market
Deebo Samuel Sr.’s market
Why Dalton Schultz
Start· lowTE1 in high-volume pass-catching role. Reliable chain-mover over the middle with sure hands.
22% target share in an offense implied for 25.0 points gives Schultz a usable floor, though his TE21 consensus rank sits outside TE1 range.
- His chain-moving role over the middle can keep him involved without needing a long gain or a designed touch.
- The 26-point recent peak shows he can outproduce his low-end TE standing when the role clicks.
The call
- Usage is the selling point. A 22% target share through 3 games is strong volume for a tight end, and he carries no injury designation.
- Game environment helps. An implied team total of 25.0 as a 2.5-point favorite points to a productive, balanced script with scoring chances.
- The matchup is mildly favorable at 21 of 32 against the position. It rests on a 3-game sample with 0.25 confidence, so it adds little.
- The risk is his ceiling. A 63% snap share and a 9.0-point projection at TE21 make him a streaming-level start. Any healthy top-12 tight end should start over him.
Latest on Schultz
Reported by the sources listed — not independently verified.
Why Deebo Samuel Sr.
Toss-Up· lowStarting WR and hybrid weapon. Yards-after-catch bully used on jet sweeps and manufactured touches.
WR53 at 10.7 projected with a 14% target share is flex-fringe; a solid 24.5 team total offsets a tougher DEN matchup (8 of 32).
- Jet sweeps and other manufactured touches give him ways to produce beyond routine receiver targets.
- Two double-digit outings in his last three show the upside Schultz's steadier role may not match.
The call
- The model leans start, but a consensus WR53 rank and a 10.7-point projection sit below typical 12-team starting and flex thresholds. This is a depth-dependent call, not a clear start.
- Usage is modest for a WR-2. A 59% snap share and 14% target share over 3 games cap his floor and leave him reliant on efficiency or a big play.
- Game environment helps. A 24.5 implied total and a -2.5 spread point to a competitive, productive offense. DEN grades as a tougher draw at 8 of 32, but that rests on a 3-game sample with 0.25 confidence, so don't overweight it.
- Start him if your alternative is a similar-tier WR5 or a bye-week fill-in. Sit him for any flex option projected clearly above 10.7.
Latest on Samuel
Reported by the sources listed — not independently verified.
Head-to-head stats
| Metric | Dalton Schultz | Deebo Samuel Sr. |
|---|---|---|
| Projected points | 4.97.09.0 | 7.39.010.7 |
| Consensus rank | TE21 | WR53 |
| Opponent vs position | DAL · 21 of 323-game sample | DEN · 8 of 323-game sample |
| Receptions | 19 of 32 | 1 of 32 |
| Receiving Yards | 19 of 32 | 16 of 32 |
| Receiving TDs | 27 of 32 | 7 of 32 |
| Targets | 13 of 32 | 12 of 32 |
| Anytime TD | 26 of 32 | 6 of 32 |
| Target share | 22% | 14% |
| Reception share | 26% | 15% |
| Implied total · spread | 25.0-2.5 | 24.5-2.5 |
| Depth chart | TE1 | WR2 |
| Snap share | 63% | 59% |
| Start/Sit record | 0–1 | 1–0+3 toss-ups |
Recent form
Dalton Schultz — last 3 weeks
| Week 3 | vs IND | 3.04.56.0 |
| Week 2 | vs CIN | 14.020.026.0 |
| Week 1 | vs BUF | 3.55.57.5 |
Deebo Samuel Sr. — last 3 weeks
| Week 3 | vs ARI | 15.415.415.4 |
| Week 2 | vs MIA | 3.55.06.5 |
| Week 1 | vs LAR | 12.015.018.0 |
Signal breakdown
- 9.0 vs 10.7 projected PPR pointsDeebo Samuel Sr. +
- Rank 21 vs 53Dalton Schultz +
- Opponent DvP rank 21 vs 8 (32 = softest)Dalton Schultz +
- Implied 25.0 vs 24.5 team pointsDalton Schultz +
- No injury designationseven
- 63% vs 59% snap shareDalton Schultz +
Compare different players
Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.
More Schultz comparisons
More Samuel comparisons
This week’s toughest calls
- K. WilliamsKyren WilliamsRBLARvs PHI
C. SkatteboCam SkatteboRBNYGvs ARI
- C. SkatteboCam SkatteboRBNYGvs ARI
D. SwiftD'Andre SwiftRBCHIvs NYJ
- D. SwiftD'Andre SwiftRBCHIvs NYJ
B. TutenBhayshul TutenRBJAXvs CIN
- B. TutenBhayshul TutenRBJAXvs CIN
B. IrvingBucky IrvingRBTBvs GB
- B. IrvingBucky IrvingRBTBvs GB
D. MontgomeryDavid MontgomeryRBHOUvs DAL
- D. MontgomeryDavid MontgomeryRBHOUvs DAL
R. StevensonRhamondre StevensonRBNEvs BUF
- T. HigginsTee HigginsWRCINvs JAX
D. AdamsDavante AdamsWRLARvs PHI
- D. AdamsDavante AdamsWRLARvs PHI
D. MooreDJ MooreWRBUFvs NE
- D. MooreDJ MooreWRBUFvs NE
C. WatsonChristian WatsonWRGBvs TB
- C. WatsonChristian WatsonWRGBvs TB
P. WashingtonParker WashingtonWRJAXvs CIN
- P. WashingtonParker WashingtonWRJAXvs CIN
M. WilsonMichael WilsonWRARIvs NYG
- M. WilsonMichael WilsonWRARIvs NYG
S. DiggsStefon DiggsWRWSHvs IND
- K. Pitts Sr.Kyle Pitts Sr.TEATLvs NO
G. KittleGeorge KittleTESFvs DEN
- G. KittleGeorge KittleTESFvs DEN
S. LaPortaSam LaPortaTEDETvs CAR
- S. LaPortaSam LaPortaTEDETvs CAR
T. KraftTucker KraftTEGBvs TB
- T. KraftTucker KraftTEGBvs TB
T. KelceTravis KelceTEKCvs LV
- T. KelceTravis KelceTEKCvs LV
J. FergusonJake FergusonTEDALvs HOU
- J. FergusonJake FergusonTEDALvs HOU
I. LikelyIsaiah LikelyTENYGvs ARI
- T. LawrenceTrevor LawrenceQBJAXvs CIN
B. PurdyBrock PurdyQBSFvs DEN
- B. PurdyBrock PurdyQBSFvs DEN
P. MahomesPatrick MahomesQBKCvs LV
- P. MahomesPatrick MahomesQBKCvs LV
M. StaffordMatthew StaffordQBLARvs PHI
- M. StaffordMatthew StaffordQBLARvs PHI
K. MurrayKyler MurrayQBMINvs MIA
- K. MurrayKyler MurrayQBMINvs MIA
T. ShoughTyler ShoughQBNOvs ATL
- T. ShoughTyler ShoughQBNOvs ATL
J. GoffJared GoffQBDETvs CAR
- K. FairbairnKa'imi FairbairnKHOUvs DAL
H. ButkerHarrison ButkerKKCvs LV
- H. ButkerHarrison ButkerKKCvs LV
T. LoopTyler LoopKBALvs TEN
- T. LoopTyler LoopKBALvs TEN
W. ReichardWill ReichardKMINvs MIA
- W. ReichardWill ReichardKMINvs MIA
E. McPhersonEvan McPhersonKCINvs JAX
- E. McPhersonEvan McPhersonKCINvs JAX
C. McLaughlinChase McLaughlinKTBvs GB
- C. McLaughlinChase McLaughlinKTBvs GB
S. ShraderSpencer ShraderKINDvs WSH
- Vikings D/STVikings D/STDSTMINvs MIA
Browns D/STBrowns D/STDSTCLEvs PIT
- Browns D/STBrowns D/STDSTCLEvs PIT
Bills D/STBills D/STDSTBUFvs NE
- Bills D/STBills D/STDSTBUFvs NE
Commanders D/STCommanders D/STDSTWSHvs IND
- Commanders D/STCommanders D/STDSTWSHvs IND
Packers D/STPackers D/STDSTGBvs TB
- Packers D/STPackers D/STDSTGBvs TB
Bears D/STBears D/STDSTCHIvs NYJ
- Bears D/STBears D/STDSTCHIvs NYJ
Giants D/STGiants D/STDSTNYGvs ARI
- C. SkatteboCam SkatteboRBNYGvs ARI
P. WashingtonParker WashingtonWRJAXvs CIN
- C. WatsonChristian WatsonWRGBvs TB
J. WarrenJaylen WarrenRBPITvs CLE
- J. WarrenJaylen WarrenRBPITvs CLE
J. CokerJalen CokerWRCARvs DET
- J. CokerJalen CokerWRCARvs DET
G. KittleGeorge KittleTESFvs DEN
- G. KittleGeorge KittleTESFvs DEN
D. SwiftD'Andre SwiftRBCHIvs NYJ
- D. SwiftD'Andre SwiftRBCHIvs NYJ
T. HigginsTee HigginsWRCINvs JAX
- J. DownsJosh DownsWRINDvs WSH
D. MontgomeryDavid MontgomeryRBHOUvs DAL
- D. MontgomeryDavid MontgomeryRBHOUvs DAL
M. WilsonMichael WilsonWRARIvs NYG
Get a Start/Sit call on your whole roster →
Save your team once and see a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up verdict on every player, every week — with the matchup, usage and game-script evidence behind each call.
Add to My Team — freeOr browse this week’s NFL games or NFL player props.






