Mark Andrews or Rhamondre Stevenson: Who Should You Start?

2026 Week 1 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.

Andrews gets the better scoring environment; Stevenson needs volume to overcome it

Mark Andrews is the better start because his TE11 standing and Baltimore's scoring environment outweigh a nearly identical raw projection. Stevenson has genuine lead-back appeal—ESPN 2026-09-06 says he would have been the clear-cut starter regardless of Henderson's status—but his lower-end RB31 ranking and New England's modest total leave less room for a ceiling game. The call is not comfortable: Stevenson actually projects slightly higher, while Andrews' 62% snap share leaves him dependent on efficiency and red-zone conversion rather than locked-in volume.

What flips it: An Andrews availability downgrade.

Sources: ESPN · Sep 6, 2026

AI editor

Mark Andrews

Mark Andrews

TE11BALvs IND

Projected Points

Start· medium
Rhamondre Stevenson

Rhamondre Stevenson

RB31NEvs SEA

Projected Points

Toss-Up· medium

Why Mark Andrews

Start· medium

TE1 and red-zone mismatch. Veteran seam-stretcher with strong hands and quarterback rapport.

TE11 with a 17% target share in a 26.5-point implied offense — red-zone role and favorable game script make him a fine TE1 play.

  • His TE1/red-zone mismatch profile turns Baltimore's favorable script into touchdown equity, not just yardage.
  • Quarterback rapport helps offset a 62% snap share that is lighter than a full-time every-down role.

The call

  • A 17% target share on 62% of snaps is a genuine TE1 workload, and Andrews' value is concentrated near the goal line, where Baltimore's 26.5 implied total gives him multiple scoring looks.
  • Vegas has the Ravens as 3.5-point favorites with a healthy team total — the neutral-to-positive script keeps the offense balanced instead of pass-chasing away from the tight end.
  • The Colts grade 20 of 32 vs the position, a mild edge, but the 0-game sample means it shouldn't move the needle either way.
  • Risk is the usual Andrews boom-bust: 10.1 projected points is TE11 territory, so a touchdown-less afternoon leaves him near replacement level — you're starting him for the ceiling.

Why Rhamondre Stevenson

Toss-Up· medium

RB1 and lead back. Physical between-the-tackles runner with reliable receiving-game involvement.

59% snap share keeps a real floor, but RB31 value, a middling 12-of-32 matchup and a 20.5 implied total as 3.5-point dogs cap the ceiling.

  • Clear-cut starter status supports Stevenson if New England leans on him as an underdog.
  • Receiving-game involvement gives him a path to recover value if Seattle forces a catch-up script.

The call

  • Volume is there — 59% of snaps over 14 games in the lead RB slot — but only a 9% target share means he needs goal-line work to clear his 10.5-point projection.
  • Seattle grades 12 of 32 in the DvP composite, closer to the tough end, and New England's 20.5 implied total with a 3.5-point deficit points to a chase script that favors passing down backs.
  • RB31 consensus is flex territory, not a set-and-forget start: if TreVeyon Henderson's status opens up more of the backfield, Stevenson jumps to a clear start; if it's a committee, sit him for a back in a better game environment.

Latest on Stevenson

Role

Rhamondre Stevenson would have been the Patriots' clear-cut starter regardless of Henderson's status.

What will Patriots do if RB TreVeyon Henderson is out Week 1?ESPN · Sep 6, 2026

Head-to-head stats

MetricMark AndrewsRhamondre Stevenson
Projected points
Consensus rankTE11RB31
Opponent vs positionIND · 20 of 320-game sampleSEA · 12 of 320-game sample
Receptions25 of 3232 of 32
Receiving Yards31 of 3227 of 32
Receiving TDs9 of 32
Targets24 of 32
Anytime TD9 of 321 of 32
Rushing Yards3 of 32
Rushing TDs1 of 32
Rushing Attempts9 of 32
Target share17%(2025)9%(2025)
Reception share17%(2025)11%(2025)
Implied total · spread26.5-3.520.5+3.5
Depth chartTE1RB1
Snap share62%(2025)59%(2025)
Start/Sit record00+1 toss-up

Signal breakdown

  • 10.1 vs 10.5 projected PPR pointsRhamondre Stevenson +
  • Rank 11 vs 31Mark Andrews +
  • Opponent DvP rank 20 vs 12 (32 = softest)even
  • Implied 26.5 vs 20.5 team pointsMark Andrews +
  • No injury designationseven
  • 62% vs 59% snap shareMark Andrews +

Compare different players

Week 1243 players
Player A
vs
Player B

Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.

This week’s toughest calls

Want full matchup analysis & AI picks? →

Save your roster and get a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up call on every player, every week — plus prop pages, matchup data, and AI-powered NFL analysis.

Add to My Team — free

Or browse this week’s NFL games or NFL player props.