Bhayshul Tuten or Xavier Worthy: Who Should You Start?
2026 Week 3 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.
Worthy has the steadier role; Tuten has the stronger rank case
Worthy’s broader deployment and stronger team scoring outlook make him the steadier start, but not a decisive one: Tuten’s stronger consensus standing and breakaway speed keep his ceiling in play despite a split backfield. Their projections are essentially level, and Tuten’s ranking edge is offset by Worthy’s much larger role; neither matchup grade deserves much weight from a two-game sample with zero confidence. Worthy risks turning steady snaps into uneven fantasy production as a vertical threat, while Tuten needs limited work to produce a game-breaking play.
What flips it: A sustained expansion of Tuten’s share of Jacksonville’s backfield.
AI editor
In standard and half-PPR scoring this flips to Tuten.

Bhayshul Tuten
9.310.111.0 Projected Points

Xavier Worthy
8.09.711.4 Projected Points
Bhayshul Tuten’s market
Xavier Worthy’s market
Why Bhayshul Tuten
Toss-Up· mediumExplosive RB with elite straight-line speed. Home-run threat splitting carries in the Jacksonville backfield.
RB21 at 11.0 projected with only a 50% snap share and 6% target share — a flex-caliber body in a tough 11-of-32 matchup.
- His speed gives him a home-run ceiling that can overcome a split backfield.
- His stronger consensus standing is the clearest counterweight to Worthy’s role advantage.
The call
- Role is the problem: 50% snap share and a 6% target share over two games means he's splitting the backfield and doesn't carry a PPR floor from receiving work.
- Matchup leans unfavorable — New England grades 11 of 32 in DvP composite (32 = softest), though the two-game sample carries 0.00 confidence, so don't over-weight it.
- Game script is neutral-to-fine: Jacksonville is -1.5 with a 23.5 implied total, enough scoring environment for touches to matter if he's the goal-line back.
- Consensus RB21 and 11.0 points puts him on the RB2/flex line; if your alternative is a clear bench body, start him — if you have a full-time back or a target-earning WR3, sit him.
Latest on Tuten
Reported by the sources listed — not independently verified.
Why Xavier Worthy
Start· mediumWR2 and vertical speed threat. Elite track speed with jet-motion and manufactured-touch usage.
82% snap share and a 26.0 implied team total keep Worthy in the flex mix; the tough DvP rank comes from a 2-game sample with zero confidence.
- Motion and manufactured touches give him more routes to involvement than a pure deep threat.
- Kansas City’s scoring outlook supports his case, even if the matchup grade is too early to trust.
The call
- Role is locked in: 82% snap share and a 19% target share as the WR-2 in an offense projected for 26.0 implied points is a startable weekly floor in 12-team PPR.
- The matchup grade (6 of 32 vs the position) looks scary, but it's built on a 2-game sample with 0.00 confidence — not enough to bench a full-time receiver on a good offense.
- 11.4 projected points against a WR49 consensus rank means the model sees him outproducing his price tag; that's flex value over a typical waiver replacement.
- Risk is the script: at -7.5 a comfortable lead can shrink second-half passing volume, and 19% target share leaves him dependent on efficiency rather than raw looks.
Latest on Worthy
Reported by the sources listed — not independently verified.
Head-to-head stats
| Metric | Bhayshul Tuten | Xavier Worthy |
|---|---|---|
| Projected points | 9.310.111.0 | 8.09.711.4 |
| Consensus rank | RB21 | WR49 |
| Opponent vs position | NE · 11 of 322-game sample | MIA · 6 of 322-game sample |
| Rushing Yards | 16 of 32 | — |
| Rushing TDs | 1 of 32 | — |
| Rushing Attempts | 11 of 32 | — |
| Receptions | 11 of 32 | 7 of 32 |
| Receiving Yards | 24 of 32 | 6 of 32 |
| Anytime TD | 1 of 32 | 7 of 32 |
| Receiving TDs | — | 7 of 32 |
| Targets | — | 2 of 32 |
| Target share | 6% | 19% |
| Reception share | 9% | 17% |
| Implied total · spread | 23.5-1.5 | 26.0-7.5 |
| Depth chart | RB1 | WR2 |
| Snap share | 50% | 82% |
| Start/Sit record | 0–0+2 toss-ups | 1–0+1 toss-up |
Recent form
Bhayshul Tuten — last 2 weeks
| Week 2 | vs DEN | 12.213.214.2 |
| Week 1 | vs CLE | 8.89.39.8 |
Xavier Worthy — last 2 weeks
| Week 2 | vs IND | 8.511.013.5 |
| Week 1 | vs DEN | 1.83.34.8 |
Signal breakdown
- 11.0 vs 11.4 projected PPR pointsXavier Worthy +
- Rank 21 vs 49Bhayshul Tuten +
- Opponent DvP rank 11 vs 6 (32 = softest)even
- Implied 23.5 vs 26.0 team pointsXavier Worthy +
- No injury designationseven
- 50% vs 82% snap shareXavier Worthy +
Compare different players
Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.
More Tuten comparisons
More Worthy comparisons
This week’s toughest calls
- K. Walker IIIKenneth Walker IIIRBKCvs MIA
K. WilliamsKyren WilliamsRBLARvs DEN
- K. WilliamsKyren WilliamsRBLARvs DEN
Q. JudkinsQuinshon JudkinsRBCLEvs CAR
- Q. JudkinsQuinshon JudkinsRBCLEvs CAR
C. SkatteboCam SkatteboRBNYGvs TEN
- C. SkatteboCam SkatteboRBNYGvs TEN
D. SwiftD'Andre SwiftRBCHIvs PHI
- D. SwiftD'Andre SwiftRBCHIvs PHI
B. TutenBhayshul TutenRBJAXvs NE
- B. TutenBhayshul TutenRBJAXvs NE
B. IrvingBucky IrvingRBTBvs MIN
- T. HigginsTee HigginsWRCINvs PIT
D. AdamsDavante AdamsWRLARvs DEN
- D. AdamsDavante AdamsWRLARvs DEN
M. EvansMike EvansWRSFvs ARI
- M. EvansMike EvansWRSFvs ARI
C. WatsonChristian WatsonWRGBvs ATL
- C. WatsonChristian WatsonWRGBvs ATL
P. WashingtonParker WashingtonWRJAXvs NE
- P. WashingtonParker WashingtonWRJAXvs NE
M. GoldenMatthew GoldenWRGBvs ATL
- M. GoldenMatthew GoldenWRGBvs ATL
Q. JohnstonQuentin JohnstonWRLACvs BUF
- K. Pitts Sr.Kyle Pitts Sr.TEATLvs GB
G. KittleGeorge KittleTESFvs ARI
- G. KittleGeorge KittleTESFvs ARI
S. LaPortaSam LaPortaTEDETvs NYJ
- S. LaPortaSam LaPortaTEDETvs NYJ
T. KraftTucker KraftTEGBvs ATL
- T. KraftTucker KraftTEGBvs ATL
T. KelceTravis KelceTEKCvs MIA
- T. KelceTravis KelceTEKCvs MIA
J. FergusonJake FergusonTEDALvs BAL
- J. FergusonJake FergusonTEDALvs BAL
I. LikelyIsaiah LikelyTENYGvs TEN
- D. PrescottDak PrescottQBDALvs BAL
J. HerbertJustin HerbertQBLACvs BUF
- J. HerbertJustin HerbertQBLACvs BUF
T. LawrenceTrevor LawrenceQBJAXvs NE
- T. LawrenceTrevor LawrenceQBJAXvs NE
B. PurdyBrock PurdyQBSFvs ARI
- B. PurdyBrock PurdyQBSFvs ARI
P. MahomesPatrick MahomesQBKCvs MIA
- P. MahomesPatrick MahomesQBKCvs MIA
B. NixBo NixQBDENvs LAR
- B. NixBo NixQBDENvs LAR
M. StaffordMatthew StaffordQBLARvs DEN
- E. PineiroEddy PineiroKSFvs ARI
J. BatesJake BatesKDETvs NYJ
- J. BatesJake BatesKDETvs NYJ
H. ButkerHarrison ButkerKKCvs MIA
- H. ButkerHarrison ButkerKKCvs MIA
T. LoopTyler LoopKBALvs DAL
- T. LoopTyler LoopKBALvs DAL
C. BoswellChris BoswellKPITvs CIN
- C. BoswellChris BoswellKPITvs CIN
C. McLaughlinChase McLaughlinKTBvs MIN
- C. McLaughlinChase McLaughlinKTBvs MIN
T. SmackTrey SmackKGBvs ATL
- 49ers D/ST49ers D/STDSTSFvs ARI
Panthers D/STPanthers D/STDSTCARvs CLE
- Panthers D/STPanthers D/STDSTCARvs CLE
Lions D/STLions D/STDSTDETvs NYJ
- Lions D/STLions D/STDSTDETvs NYJ
Giants D/STGiants D/STDSTNYGvs TEN
- Giants D/STGiants D/STDSTNYGvs TEN
Saints D/STSaints D/STDSTNOvs LV
- Saints D/STSaints D/STDSTNOvs LV
Bengals D/STBengals D/STDSTCINvs PIT
- Bengals D/STBengals D/STDSTCINvs PIT
Titans D/STTitans D/STDSTTENvs NYG
- B. IrvingBucky IrvingRBTBvs MIN
P. WashingtonParker WashingtonWRJAXvs NE
- P. WashingtonParker WashingtonWRJAXvs NE
C. HubbardChuba HubbardRBCARvs CLE
- C. HubbardChuba HubbardRBCARvs CLE
C. WatsonChristian WatsonWRGBvs ATL
- C. WatsonChristian WatsonWRGBvs ATL
C. SkatteboCam SkatteboRBNYGvs TEN
- C. SkatteboCam SkatteboRBNYGvs TEN
J. CokerJalen CokerWRCARvs CLE
- D. AdamsDavante AdamsWRLARvs DEN
Q. JudkinsQuinshon JudkinsRBCLEvs CAR
- J. WarrenJaylen WarrenRBPITvs CIN
T. HigginsTee HigginsWRCINvs PIT
- T. HigginsTee HigginsWRCINvs PIT
D. SwiftD'Andre SwiftRBCHIvs PHI
Get a Start/Sit call on your whole roster →
Save your team once and see a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up verdict on every player, every week — with the matchup, usage and game-script evidence behind each call.
Add to My Team — freeOr browse this week’s NFL games or NFL player props.




