Elijah Higgins or Pat Freiermuth: Who Should You Start?

Preliminary board

2026 Week 1 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.

Verdicts sharpen as practice reports land.

Freiermuth's real role dwarfs Higgins' fringe one

Freiermuth isn't just projected higher, he's built the floor to hit it: a seam/underneath role with red-zone touches gives him touches even in a game where Pittsburgh is favored and expected to score in bulk. Higgins is stuck in a move/H-back role that hasn't produced targets all year, and a questionable tag on top of a nearly non-existent receiving role removes any margin for error. The gap here isn't projection noise — a nearly six-point spread at tight end reflects two totally different jobs, not two flavors of the same one. The lone risk with Freiermuth is game-script related if Pittsburgh leans on the run with a lead, but that's a bench-him-for-more-points problem, not a start/sit one.

What flips it: A sudden increase in Higgins' snap share tied to an injury elsewhere on Arizona's depth chart, or a limiting practice designation for Freiermuth, would be the only things worth revisiting this call.

AI editor

Elijah Higgins

Elijah Higgins

TEARIvs LAC

Projected Points

Sit· high
Pat Freiermuth

Pat Freiermuth

TE24PITvs ATL

Projected Points

Start

Why Elijah Higgins

Sit· high

TE2 in move/H-back role. Versatile alignment with developing receiving production.

2.5 projected points on a 6% target share, plus a questionable tag and a 17.0 implied total as an 11.5-point underdog — unstartable.

  • His move/H-back alignment means his routes come from unpredictable spots, but that versatility hasn't translated into targets.
  • Any spike week would require a sudden role change; nothing in his 2025 usage suggests it's coming.

The call

  • A 6% target share on 43% snaps is a blocking-first role; there's no volume path to TE1 production even in a positive script.
  • The 2.5-point projection is replacement level at the position — nearly any streaming tight end with a defined pass-game role beats it.
  • Vegas has this team at a 17.0 implied total while chasing an 11.5-point spread; garbage-time targets would go to receivers, not the No. 2 tight end.
  • The questionable designation adds inactive risk on top of an already negligible ceiling.

Why Pat Freiermuth

Start

Starting TE in dual-role usage. Reliable underneath/seam target with red-zone production.

Start — TE24 consensus, projects TE17 this week: ATL is the 3rd-toughest matchup vs TEs, 12% target share in 2025.

  • His seam/underneath role gives him schematic access to easy completions regardless of how the score breaks.
  • Established red-zone usage gives him touchdown equity that a 6% target share simply can't match.

Head-to-head stats

MetricElijah HigginsPat Freiermuth
Projected points
Consensus rankTE24
Opponent vs positionLAC · 5 of 320-game sampleATL · 3 of 320-game sample
Receptions3 of 323 of 32
Receiving Yards4 of 328 of 32
Receiving TDs9 of 321 of 32
Targets2 of 324 of 32
Anytime TD9 of 321 of 32
Target share6%(2025)12%(2025)
Reception share8%(2025)13%(2025)
Implied total · spread17.0+11.522.8-3.0
Depth chartTE2TE1
Snap share43%(2025)53%(2025)
Injury designationQuestionable

Signal breakdown

  • 2.6 vs 8.4 projected PPR pointsPat Freiermuth +
  • Consensus position rankeven
  • Opponent DvP rank 5 vs 3 (32 = softest)even
  • Implied 17.0 vs 22.8 team pointsPat Freiermuth +
  • Questionable vs no designationPat Freiermuth +
  • 43% vs 53% snap sharePat Freiermuth +

Compare different players

Week 1171 players
Player A
vs
Player B

Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.

This week’s toughest calls

Want full matchup analysis & AI picks? →

Save your roster and get a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up call on every player, every week — plus prop pages, matchup data, and AI-powered NFL analysis.

Add to My Team — free

Or browse NFL player props or this week’s Start/Sit board.