DeVonta Smith or Rome Odunze: Who Should You Start?

Preliminary board

2026 Week 1 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.

Verdicts sharpen as practice reports land.

Smith's role survives a tougher matchup; Odunze's easier one hinges on volume trust

Smith is the higher-floor route technician here, and Philadelphia's 26-point implied total still funnels him targets even against a Washington defense that isn't handing out easy production. Odunze's matchup is the one that actually looks soft, but a 0-game DvP sample means that edge is mostly speculation dressed up as data. The real separator is availability — Smith's questionable tag is the only thing making this closer than his rank and role suggest it should be. If he's healthy, this isn't a hard call; if he's limited, Odunze's matching target share and clean bill of health close the gap fast.

What flips it: A Friday downgrade or worse for Smith flips this to Odunze outright.

AI editor

DeVonta Smith

DeVonta Smith

WR16PHIvs WSH

Projected Points

Start
Rome Odunze

Rome Odunze

WR26CHIvs CAR

Projected Points

Start· medium

Why DeVonta Smith

Start

WR2 and primary route technician. Slender frame with elite separation, releases, and reliable hands.

Start — every-week WR start at consensus WR16: WSH is the 10th-softest matchup vs WRs, 26.0 implied team total.

  • Elite separator role in a top-16 target share offense gives him weekly floor even against a tougher matchup read.
  • A 26.0 implied team total still means plenty of scoring plays to target, even if Washington isn't the softest matchup.

Why Rome Odunze

Start· medium

Starting outside WR and rising WR1 target. Big-bodied X-receiver with contested-catch ability and red-zone production.

24% target share on 88% of snaps makes Odunze a volume-proof WR2; the tough DvP read comes from a 0-game sample with zero confidence.

  • Matching 24% target share on a slightly higher snap rate shows Odunze's role is just as central to Chicago's passing offense.
  • No injury concern at all this week, while Smith's questionable tag is the actual gap-closer between these two.

The call

  • Role is locked in: 88% snap share and a 24% target share over 12 games — that's alpha-level usage for Chicago and the floor a 12-team PPR lineup needs.
  • The matchup grades tough on paper (7 of 32 vs the position), but that composite carries a 0-game sample and 0.00 confidence, so it shouldn't override established target volume.
  • Game script is neutral-to-friendly: a 2.5-point favorite with a 23.5 implied total means a competitive, pass-relevant afternoon rather than a run-out-the-clock blowout.
  • Consensus WR26 at 12.4 projected points is a clear start over replacement-level flex options; the risk is efficiency, not opportunity.

Head-to-head stats

MetricDeVonta SmithRome Odunze
Projected points
Consensus rankWR16WR26
Opponent vs positionWSH · 23 of 320-game sampleCAR · 7 of 320-game sample
Receptions25 of 328 of 32
Receiving Yards27 of 328 of 32
Receiving TDs22 of 325 of 32
Targets23 of 328 of 32
Anytime TD18 of 327 of 32
Target share24%(2025)24%(2025)
Reception share24%(2025)19%(2025)
Implied total · spread26.0-5.523.5-2.5
Depth chartWR1WR1
Snap share84%(2025)88%(2025)
Injury designationQuestionable

Signal breakdown

  • 14.8 vs 12.4 projected PPR pointsDeVonta Smith +
  • Rank 16 vs 26DeVonta Smith +
  • Opponent DvP rank 23 vs 7 (32 = softest)even
  • Implied 26.0 vs 23.5 team pointsDeVonta Smith +
  • Questionable vs no designationRome Odunze +
  • 84% vs 88% snap shareRome Odunze +

Compare different players

Week 1171 players
Player A
vs
Player B

Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.

This week’s toughest calls

Want full matchup analysis & AI picks? →

Save your roster and get a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up call on every player, every week — plus prop pages, matchup data, and AI-powered NFL analysis.

Add to My Team — free

Or browse NFL player props or this week’s Start/Sit board.